ICVTS Click here to goto Smart Canula website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Andrew T. Goodwin
Adrian Ooi
Samer A.M. Nashef
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodwin, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Nashef, S. A.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodwin, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Nashef, S. A.M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 2:227-230(2003)
© 2003 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery


Institutional review - Cardiac general

Outcomes in emergency redo cardiac surgery: cost, benefit and risk assessment

Andrew T. Goodwin, Adrian Ooi, Jago Kitcat and Samer A.M. Nashef*

Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridge, CB3 8RE, UK

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-1480-364299; fax: +44-1480-364744
sam.nashef{at}euroscore.org

Emergency redo surgery is rare, but may be required in patients with conditions such as endocarditis, unstable angina and acute aortic dissection. To date there are no published data on the outcome of these difficult patients. Prospective consecutive data were collected from a single institution on 65 patients (51 male) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafts (27), mitral valve replacement or repair (13), aortic valve replacement (7), aortic surgery (13), and other (combined procedures) (5). Indications for surgery were unstable angina (12), endocarditis (11), resuscitation/catheter lab complications (11), torn prosthetic leaflet (6), aortic dissection (4), paraprosthetic leak (2), other (19). Mean ITU stay was 45 h (0–284) and hospital stay was 13.3 days (0–68). There were 14 intra-operative deaths and 14 further in-hospital deaths (overall mortality 43%). Predicted mortality rates were 26% (Parsonnet), 11% (EuroSCORE) and 31% (EuroSCORE logistic). Mean hospital cost per patient was euro18,299 (or Euro32,147 per hospital survivor). In conclusion, the mortality in these difficult patients is very high, however, often no other treatment option is available. More sophisticated models, such as EuroSCORE logistic, may allow better prediction of risk in very high risk cases.

Key Words: Coronary artery surgery; Outcome; EuroSCORE; Resternotomy; Emergency







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery