This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Vladimir Alexi-Meskishvili Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dittrich, S. Articles by Lange, P. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dittrich, S. Articles by Lange, P. E. Related Collections Cardiac - pharmacology Congenital - acyanotic Great vessels

Comparison of sodium nitroprusside versus esmolol for the treatment of hypertension following repair of coarctation of the aorta

Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany

^* Corresponding author. Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Mathildenstrasse 1, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany. Tel.: +49-761-270-4323; fax: +49-761-270-4468
dittrich{at}kikli.ukl.uni-freiburg.de

Postoperative arterial hypertension was treated with nitroprusside or esmolol in a prospective randomized study. If treatment failed, patients were first switched over to the other study drug, and then to a combination of both. Renin, angiotensin II, epinephrine, and norepinephrine were measured before, 1, and 17 h after operation. esmolol was effective in all cases of treatment () whereas nitroprusside was ineffective in two out of seven patients (not significant), who were finally treated effectively with the combination of the study drugs. Whenever monotherapy failed, both drugs together were effective in reducing the postoperative activation of the sympathetic and renin-angiotensin systems.

Key Words: Coarctation; Esmolol; Nitroprusside; Renin; Catecholamine